Current:Home > BackSouth Carolina Supreme Court to decide if new private school voucher program is legal-LoTradeCoin
South Carolina Supreme Court to decide if new private school voucher program is legal
View Date:2024-12-23 19:24:17
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — The South Carolina Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday on whether a law passed last year allowing parents to spend taxpayer money on private schools violates part of the he state constitution banning direct aid to anything other than public schools.
But even as the justices ponder the case, lawmakers in the House are looking to expand the program beyond the law’s provision for vouchers of up to $6,000 for up to 15,000 students a year.
The case centers on the part of the South Carolina’s constitution that says “no money shall be paid from public funds nor shall the credit of the State or any of its political subdivisions be used for the direct benefit of any religious or other private educational institution.”
Lawyers who think the program is illegal said giving the private schools public money is a direct benefit even if the program allows students to pay fees or transportation to attend a public school outside of their district.
“It’s all in a trust fund – it’s all in a state controlled trust fund,” attorney Ramya Ravindran told the justices.
But supporters of the new law said the trust fund is key. The money goes to parents, who get to make a decision on where to spend it instead of state government directly paying the private schools themselves.
“The Rosetta Stone of this case is to figure out who the direct beneficiary is,” said Jim Gilliam, an attorney for Republican House Speaker Murrell Smith.
Smith last week proposed a bill that would make the program open to all students, eliminating by 2027 what was going to be a $120,000 family income cap and a cap on 2% of the school age population, or about 15,000 students.
The bill that would also eliminate state audits for private schools getting the money and not require them to give their students the same standardized tests as public school students as a comparison passed a subcommittee Tuesday and will likely head to the House floor Thursday.
Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey said last week he wants to see what the state Supreme Court says and give the program some time to operate before changing things.
“Before you look at expanding it, you need to makes sure this one is going to work,” Massey said.
The law is part of a nationwide movement. Groups that study the programs report that as many as 16 states have some form of the vouchers.
A second possible problem with the South Carolina law for supporters is the law has the state Education Superintendent running the program. The constitution calls her the “chief administrative officer of the public education system.” The state says that doesn’t prohibit her from expanding her duties.
“How can the legislature require that individual get involved in private education?” asked James Lockemy, a retired Court of Appeals chief judge sitting in on this case.
Allowing parents to spend public money on private schools has been a two decade effort that ran through three governors, four House speakers and five education superintendents in a state where Republicans have been consolidating and expanding their power.
The justices Tuesday peppered both sides with questions. Chief Justice Donald Beatty was especially skeptical of the new law, mentioning an earlier state Supreme Court ruling that the governor could not send COVID relief money directly to private schools.
“Obviously, we weren’t convincing then, were we?” Beatty said introducing Wednesday’s case.
Later, Education Department attorney Miles Coleman said no private school sees the new money as a benefit when a state agency gets additional oversight and access to their books.
“This money isn’t even enough to cover what we think is the cost as a state of education. It’s not some sort of largess or boon to the recipient,” Coleman said of the program’s $90 million price tag.
“$90 million is not a boon?” asked Beatty, who earlier in the arguments said that would be enough money to hire 2,200 public school teachers, adding “yet we want to shift all this money to private schools to keep them afloat.”
The justices made no decision Wednesday and will issue a ruling at a later date.
veryGood! (97)
Related
- Pistons' Ausar Thompson cleared to play after missing 8 months with blood clot
- 4 arrested after a shooting that wounded a Minneapolis police officer
- Rory McIlroy takes a jab at Phil Mickelson over excerpt from golf gambling book
- 'No place to live': Why rebuilding Maui won't be easy after deadly fires
- Alexandra Daddario shares first postpartum photo of baby: 'Women's bodies are amazing'
- Researchers have identified a new pack of endangered gray wolves in California
- Russia downs 20 drones over Crimea following a spate of attacks on Moscow
- Naomi Campbell Shares Rare Insight Into Life as a Mom of Two
- Artem Chigvintsev Returns to Dancing With the Stars Ballroom Amid Nikki Garcia Divorce
- Lionel Messi scores, Inter Miami beats Charlotte in Leagues Cup quarterfinals
Ranking
- Zendaya Shares When She Feels Extra Safe With Boyfriend Tom Holland
- Parts of Maui are in ashes after wildfires blazed across the Hawaiian island. These photos show the destruction.
- Jordin Canada speaks on success back home with Los Angeles Sparks, Nipsey Hussle influence
- GBI investigating after 62-year-old man dies in Atlanta Police custody
- Police identify 7-year-old child killed in North Carolina weekend shooting
- Arkansas governor names Shea Lewis as Parks, Heritage and Tourism secretary
- Mom stabbed another parent during elementary school pickup over road rage: Vegas police
- Jodie Sweetin Disappointed Her New Movie Was Sold to Former Costar Candace Cameron Bure's Network
Recommendation
-
Mike Tyson has lived a wild life. These 10 big moments have defined his career
-
They lost everything in the Paradise fire. Now they’re reliving their grief as fires rage in Hawaii
-
Zoom's updated TOS prompted concerns about AI and privacy. Can the two go hand-in-hand?
-
Rising political threats take US into uncharted territory as 2024 election looms
-
Agents search home of ex-lieutenant facing scrutiny as police probe leak of school shooting evidence
-
Woody Harrelson wears hat supporting RFK Jr. for president: 'Great seeing you'
-
Real Housewives Star Kyle Richards Shares the Must-Pack Travel Essentials for Your Next Trip
-
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried jailed by federal judge for alleged witness tampering